On 24/06/2023 3:31 pm, Daryl wrote:
> On 24/6/2023 2:37 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>>
>> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
>> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.
>
> Not surprised by that, they are pretty amazing photos.

Yep. some of the best I've seen. Ever.

>> The sound when she took it vertical was deafening. The vibration was
>> pretty amazing as well.

> Saw various fighters do that maneuver at Avalon, incredible machines and
> very highly skilled pilots.

Without doubt... i'd imagine the Pacific Air Show would be the best, but
I believe all the high rise rooms are already sold out. Which doesnt
leave much. I'm in the middle of a fishing trip to Perth, a cruise to
NZ, and didnt realise the PAS was so close. Oh Well, shit happens. As
long as Grumpy keeps posting his pics here, I'll be a happy man.. :-D

>
>

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:00:39 +1000, lindsay wrote:

>
> Have a look at Tomas Clasener posting about who's "smart* :-D
>
>
> Hey, shit-fer-brains, any of this ring a bell?
>
> "he deleted them"
> "wedge type "wood splitters throw the wood at the operator"
> "ask Krypsis"
> "Kangaroos are not protected"
> "golf is a winter sport"
> "40GB phone dongle"
> "Radar phones"
> "Cockpit Voice Recorders"
> my mate..... all 21 million of them...
> 8yo V6 Navara's with 12yo 4cyl probs?
> Camry brakes?
> Amiga computers development?

'Fraid you've made a goose of yourself *again*. (Ashley, you're a hybrid.
Part goose, part chicken. A 'gicken'?)

Generally, a 'lie' is a when someone *knowingly* makes an untrue
statement. What you've scratched out above are *unknowing*, incorrect
'facts'.

And Dennis only knows how you can froth and rant against someone for that
pissy list of misdemeanors whilst having a bestie who has the impressive
catalogue of self-serving whoppers which the hugely hypocritical Fraudster
has been exposed on. It's a deeper mystery than the Titan.

Of course you may have valid reasons for this stupendous hypocrisy, but so
far I've not seen anything from you, (or *any* members of your cockamamy
crew come to think of it), which is within a few galaxies of it.

alvey

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:54:11 +1000, Keithr0 wrote:

>
> In the same vein, perhaps you should mark your posts here OT since, like
> this one, they rarely have anything to do with cars.

Umm. What's your alternative to telling/requesting someone to prefix their
OT post with "OT" in the offending thread Richo?

> Alternatively you could post to aus.I_hate_noddy.

And to balance that silliness out Gibbens should post to
aus.confirmed.frauds...

hth

alvey

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:36:33 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 24/06/2023 1:54 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 24/06/2023 12:21 pm, Xeno wrote:
>
>> In the same vein, perhaps you should mark your posts here OT since,
>> like this one, they rarely have anything to do with cars. Alternatively
>> you could post to aus.I_hate_noddy.
>
> I've been suggesting that he do that for years, but then there would be
> considerably less attention in doing so, and we all know that's his main
> motivational force.
>
> It would be difficult to find someone who suffers from a worse case of
> inferiority disorder.

Pass. Wayyyyy too easy.

alvey

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:37:55 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for your
>>> info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>
>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos bent
>> when she was posted to F-35s.
>>
> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>
> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>
> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.

Did you use any sharpening software?
A couple of the new AI powered ones are useful. (ie Ps & Topaz). Not great
(yet), but useful.

alvey
recalling the scene in Blade Runner where Deckard kept zooming in on a
pix. The experts at the time said that'd never happen...

On 24/06/2023 5:56 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:37:55 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for your
>>>> info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>>
>>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos bent
>>> when she was posted to F-35s.
>>>
>> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
>> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>>
>> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>>
>> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
>> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.
>
> Did you use any sharpening software?
> A couple of the new AI powered ones are useful. (ie Ps & Topaz). Not great
> (yet), but useful.

Not on all of them. Most were just denoised using DxO PureRaw 3 before
processing in photoshop. I found if I tried to sharpen them that it
messed up the writing on the plane. I have Topaz.

> alvey
> recalling the scene in Blade Runner where Deckard kept zooming in on a
> pix. The experts at the time said that'd never happen...

On 24/06/2023 2:37 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for your
>>> info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>
>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos
>> bent when she was posted to F-35s.
>>
> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>
> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>
> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.

Very clear, I thought that I could see a touch of unsharp mask here and
there on some.

> The sound when she took it vertical was deafening. The vibration was
> pretty amazing as well.

I can imagine, in one picture the engine seems to be blowing fire rings
in the exhaust. The loudest that I've heard from an aircraft was a
Canberra that ghosted along the runway, then pointed at the sky and lit
a rocket motor, you could see the shockwave diamonds in the exhaust. Not
only was it deafening, but you could feel your balls vibrating too.

On 24/06/2023 5:56 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:37:55 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for your
>>>> info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>>
>>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos bent
>>> when she was posted to F-35s.
>>>
>> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
>> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>>
>> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>>
>> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
>> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.
>
> Did you use any sharpening software?
> A couple of the new AI powered ones are useful. (ie Ps & Topaz). Not great
> (yet), but useful.

Very handy to the unskilled.

> alvey
> recalling the scene in Blade Runner where Deckard kept zooming in on a
> pix. The experts at the time said that'd never happen...

You still can't keep zooming in and keep the same resolution as Deckard did

On 24/06/2023 7:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 2:37 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for your
>>>> info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>>
>>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos
>>> bent when she was posted to F-35s.
>>>
>> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
>> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>>
>> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>>
>> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
>> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.
>
> Very clear, I thought that I could see a touch of unsharp mask here and
> there on some.

On some I used a little Topaz or in this case I did use the Unsharp mask
as it gave me better clarity than Topaz

https://ibb.co/NNFBvSR

I particularly like this shot as you see the setting sun reflected in
the windscreen and a nice golden glow on the skin of the plane.
>
>> The sound when she took it vertical was deafening. The vibration was
>> pretty amazing as well.
>
> I can imagine, in one picture the engine seems to be blowing fire rings
> in the exhaust.

That one was taken at 1/800th/sec. I ended up going to 1/2000th as I
could see some of the images were not really sharp.

> The loudest that I've heard from an aircraft was a
> Canberra that ghosted along the runway, then pointed at the sky and lit
> a rocket motor, you could see the shockwave diamonds in the exhaust. Not
> only was it deafening, but you could feel your balls vibrating too.
>
Ouch...

On 24/06/2023 9:03 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 7:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 24/06/2023 2:37 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2023 1:57 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 22/06/2023 10:19 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> A few of the hundreds of photos I took at the flyover. Just for
>>>>> your info, it's a female pilot. Did an amazing job.
>>>>
>>>> Flight Lieutenant Sarah Budd, there must have been some major egos
>>>> bent when she was posted to F-35s.
>>>>
>>> She must be okay. A lot of her fellow pilots came down to watch the
>>> display along with the official RAAF photographers.
>>>
>>> Did you read her name off the wheel hatch in the photos?
>>>
>>> I've had comments from all around the world about how amazingly clear
>>> most of the shots are considering how fast she was hooking along.
>>
>> Very clear, I thought that I could see a touch of unsharp mask here
>> and there on some.
>
> On some I used a little Topaz or in this case I did use the Unsharp mask
> as it gave me better clarity than Topaz

I just use Affinity unsharp mask, the technique is to sharpen just short
of the point where it looks like you did. I suppose that I'm a
traditionalist, I just prefer to do it myself rather than getting some
computer program to do it for me.

> https://ibb.co/NNFBvSR
>
> I particularly like this shot as you see the setting sun reflected in
> the windscreen and a nice golden glow on the skin of the plane.

I like that one, it looks the sharpest of all of them, I can see the
leading edge flaps down, a touch of condensation building up at the wing
roots, and the nav lights are correctly exposed.

On 24/06/2023 5:40 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:00:39 +1000, lindsay wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Have a look at Tomas Clasener posting about who's "smart* :-D
>>
>>
>> Hey, shit-fer-brains, any of this ring a bell?
>>
>> "he deleted them"
>> "wedge type "wood splitters throw the wood at the operator"
>> "ask Krypsis"
>> "Kangaroos are not protected"
>> "golf is a winter sport"
>> "40GB phone dongle"
>> "Radar phones"
>> "Cockpit Voice Recorders"
>> my mate..... all 21 million of them...
>> 8yo V6 Navara's with 12yo 4cyl probs?
>> Camry brakes?
>> Amiga computers development?
>
> 'Fraid you've made a goose of yourself *again*. (Ashley, you're a hybrid.
> Part goose, part chicken. A 'gicken'?)

oh. woe is me. Is this where I burst into tears, Alvey?

> Generally, a 'lie' is a when someone *knowingly* makes an untrue
> statement.

Like

"as I am a specialist auto trans mechanic" 30/04/15

"The coroner's report said it didn't happen on the Sandringham Line."
19/12/15

"Well, each of them has *confessed* that getting blind drunk is a
favourite pastime" 10/09/17

"On the contrary, I don't mind being proven wrong at all. Thus far
however, you haven't managed to do that." 03/04/17

"...that he charges a massive $15 per hour. That, I might add, is a
figure he posted here himself." 11/07/17

Those lies? That enough? I've plenty more....

> What you've scratched out above are *unknowing*, incorrect
> 'facts'.

You need to tell someone who cares, dribble dick. Try your lying
hypocritical plagiarist mate Tomas.
>
> And Dennis only knows how you can froth and rant against someone for that
> pissy list of misdemeanors whilst having a bestie

"bestie"? Wow, you keep making shit up, Alvey. I guess it's a trait the
FLC excel at, besides your other qualities you listed the other day :-D

who has the impressive
> catalogue of self-serving whoppers which the hugely hypocritical Fraudster
> has been exposed on. It's a deeper mystery than the Titan.

Captain Cliché rides again. and sinks. Like the Titan.

> Of course you may have valid reasons for this stupendous hypocrisy, but so
> far I've not seen anything from you,

That you haven't seen it is *your* problem. You should get you memory
checked, hyper-hypocrite...

On 25/06/2023 9:16 am, lindsay wrote:
> On 24/06/2023 5:40 pm, alvey wrote:

>>
>> 'Fraid you've made a goose of yourself *again*. (Ashley, you're a hybrid.
>> Part goose, part chicken. A 'gicken'?)
>
> oh. woe is me. Is this where I burst into tears, Alvey?

I'm sure that's what he'd like. God knows the whiny little cunt craves
the attention :)

>> Generally, a 'lie' is a when someone *knowingly* makes an untrue
>> statement.
>
> Like
>
> "as I am a specialist auto trans mechanic"  30/04/15
>
> "The coroner's report said it didn't happen on the Sandringham Line."
> 19/12/15
>
> "Well, each of them has *confessed* that getting blind drunk is a
> favourite pastime"  10/09/17
>
> "On the contrary, I don't mind being proven wrong at all. Thus far
> however, you haven't managed to do that." 03/04/17
>
> "...that he charges a massive $15 per hour. That, I might add, is a
> figure he posted here himself."  11/07/17
>
> Those lies? That enough? I've plenty more....

How about "You deleted them"? A deliberate lie that was not only the
most ridiculously feeble attempt to hide the fact that he was completely
wrong, but something that was a practical impossibility for me to have
done. Yet he will *still* cling to this steaming pile of excrement as
being true if asked.

How about Krypsis? Alvey thinks that anything I say is a war crime, but
completely *ignores* the fact that his new best buddy has made a career
out of inventing fake characters to use as disposable porky vessels
which, once he brings so much heat on himself that even *he* can't
bullshit his way out of it, he has them magically disappear and emerge
as an entirely new person who knew the other guy, but "hasn't seen him
for a while".

And this is the miserable shit talking mental defect that Alvey claims
is guilty of "misdemeanors?

That tells you all you need to know. About the pair of fucking losers :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 09:16:35 +1000, lindsay wrote:

> On 24/06/2023 5:40 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:00:39 +1000, lindsay wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Have a look at Tomas Clasener posting about who's "smart* :-D
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey, shit-fer-brains, any of this ring a bell?
>>>
>>> "he deleted them"
>>> "wedge type "wood splitters throw the wood at the operator" "ask
>>> Krypsis"
>>> "Kangaroos are not protected"
>>> "golf is a winter sport"
>>> "40GB phone dongle"
>>> "Radar phones"
>>> "Cockpit Voice Recorders"
>>> my mate..... all 21 million of them...
>>> 8yo V6 Navara's with 12yo 4cyl probs?
>>> Camry brakes?
>>> Amiga computers development?
>>
>> 'Fraid you've made a goose of yourself *again*. (Ashley, you're a
>> hybrid. Part goose, part chicken. A 'gicken'?)
>
> oh. woe is me. Is this where I burst into tears, Alvey?

Nope. It's where you burst like a festering boil.
>> Generally, a 'lie' is a when someone *knowingly* makes an untrue
>> statement.
>
> Like
>
> "as I am a specialist auto trans mechanic" 30/04/15
>
> "The coroner's report said it didn't happen on the Sandringham Line."
> 19/12/15
>
> "Well, each of them has *confessed* that getting blind drunk is a
> favourite pastime" 10/09/17
>
> "On the contrary, I don't mind being proven wrong at all. Thus far
> however, you haven't managed to do that." 03/04/17
>
> "...that he charges a massive $15 per hour. That, I might add, is a
> figure he posted here himself." 11/07/17
>
> Those lies? That enough? I've plenty more....

Which, if they were all summed, would be dwarfed by, 'I owned a seriously
profitable business in the Slough Industrial Estate'. Not to mention the
preceding years of The Fraud bellowing demands that everyone else prove
their claims. So do feel free to bring out all of Xenos' pissy 'lies',
you'll only look even more of a raving mad hypocrite.

>> What you've scratched out above are *unknowing*, incorrect 'facts'.
>
> You need to tell someone who cares, dribble dick. Try your lying
> hypocritical plagiarist mate Tomas.
>>
>> And Dennis only knows how you can froth and rant against someone for
>> that pissy list of misdemeanors whilst having a bestie
>
> "bestie"? Wow, you keep making shit up, Alvey. I guess it's a trait the
> FLC excel at, besides your other qualities you listed the other day :-D

lol!
Speaking of "hypocritical"... So you've arked up here about my calling
Fraudster your "bestie", yet *immediately* before this you declared that
Xeno is my "mate". Well played.

> who has the impressive
>> catalogue of self-serving whoppers which the hugely hypocritical
>> Fraudster has been exposed on. It's a deeper mystery than the Titan.
>
> Captain Cliché rides again.

Really? Where's a cliche?

> and sinks. Like the Titan.

Ummmm.

>> Of course you may have valid reasons for this stupendous hypocrisy, but
>> so far I've not seen anything from you,
>
> That you haven't seen it is *your* problem. You should get you memory
> checked, hyper-hypocrite...

Brush away all the froth & spittle and there's *still* nothing from you
attempting to explain your incredible hypocrisy. Alas, like Fraudsters'
proof of claims, I don't expect to see any as you're both incapable.

alvey

On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 10:19:43 +1000, Noddy wrote:

snip nutbaggery

> That tells you all you need to know. About the pair of fucking losers :)

I tell you what. Fraudster. The only people. That anyone who lives. In
Bumhole (Vic). Could call a "loser". Would be their neighbors.

alvey

On 25/6/2023 10:19 am, Noddy wrote:

>
> I'm sure that's what he'd like. God knows the whiny little cunt craves
> the attention :)

I know why you crave attention. It's your life of *non-achievement*.

>
>>> Generally, a 'lie' is a when someone *knowingly* makes an untrue
>>> statement.
>>
>> "as I am a specialist auto trans mechanic"  30/04/15

And have the *papers* to prove it. So - definitely true!
>>
>> "The coroner's report said it didn't happen on the Sandringham Line."
>> 19/12/15

A very true statement of fact. It happened on the *Frankston Line* near
*Malvern Station*. Papers at the archive prove its truth as much as the
*absence* of *any records whatsoever* in the name of Darren Gibbens
proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Darren never signed up to any
apprenticeship ever, not as an AME, not as a motor mechanic and
definitely not as an *auto machinist*. FFS, there aren't even any
records *in his name* on the trade registration database. You don't get
more definitive than that!

> How about Krypsis? Alvey thinks that anything I say is a war crime, but
> completely *ignores* the fact that his new best buddy has made a career
> out of inventing fake characters to use as disposable porky vessels
> which, once he brings so much heat on himself that even *he* can't
> bullshit his way out of it, he has them magically disappear and emerge
> as an entirely new person who knew the other guy, but "hasn't seen him
> for a while".

Not since Ian's funeral in Melbourne just before covid swept in and
screwed everything up. He was present at the funeral and the wake
afterwards. You could indeed call that "a while".
>
> And this is the miserable shit talking mental defect that Alvey claims
> is guilty of "misdemeanors?
>
> That tells you all you need to know. About the pair of fucking losers :)
>
About losers like you and your crew? Most certainly!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)