Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.

They have good noses after all, and to them, e=mcc=hv stinks of toxic
stuff and rotten corpses.

Good boy, Bertie. Keep it up, Tyler.

CALL FOR ACTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Get rid of inertia with Arindam's new invention, the rail gun motor, which
provides the DISCOVERY that the Lorentz force has no equal and opposite
reaction, implying thus that energy is continually created and destroyed
in our infinite universe. So out goes the silly notion of entropy as
well, and the laws of conservation of energy, along with all the gibberish
of relativity theories. So the universe is straight and eternal - no big
bang, no black holes, and very cold temperatures eight thousand miles
below our feet.

Those with wits and courage, go through the following links carefully.
Then agitate to rewrite the text books, make new motors, go for the HTN,
etc. More inventions from Arindam are on the way, now.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near
space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia
can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting
that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

*****

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

*******

2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****

In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
>
> They have good noses after all, and to them, e=mcc=hv stinks of toxic
> stuff and rotten corpses.

Just because you are incapable of understanding it doesn't make it
wrong, crackpot.

<snip crackpot ravings>

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
>>
>> They have good noses after all, and to them, e=mcc=hv stinks of toxic
>> stuff and rotten corpses.

> Just because you are incapable of understanding it doesn't make it
> wrong, crackpot.

> <snip crackpot ravings>

We dogs of Arindam thusly announce Pennino' Law:

Smaller the penis, greater the pee

Following the nature of the no-no/nano-penis entity, Jimpee the Penisnino.

Woo-woof

bt

Le 25/04/2024 à 10:29, Arindam Banerjee a écrit :
> Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
>
> They have good noses after all, and to them, e=mcc=hv stinks of toxic stuff and
> rotten corpses.
>
> Good boy, Bertie. Keep it up, Tyler.
>
> CALL FOR ACTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Get rid of inertia with Arindam's new invention, the rail gun motor, which
> provides the DISCOVERY that the Lorentz force has no equal and opposite reaction,
> implying thus that energy is continually created and destroyed in our infinite
> universe. So out goes the silly notion of entropy as well, and the laws of
> conservation of energy, along with all the gibberish of relativity theories. So
> the universe is straight and eternal - no big bang, no black holes, and very cold
> temperatures eight thousand miles below our feet.
>
> Those with wits and courage, go through the following links carefully. Then
> agitate to rewrite the text books, make new motors, go for the HTN, etc. More
> inventions from Arindam are on the way, now.
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>
>
> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
> Arindam Banerjee,
> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
> 10 Nov 2023
> (All rights reserved)
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>
> ***
>
> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
> Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near space
> , and horizontal tunneling shown in
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>
> and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia can be
> developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the
> whole system, giving it an increased velocity
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>
> *****
>
> Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ
>
> Section 1
> Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design
> of Interstellar Spacecraft
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ
>
> Section 1 (contd.)
> Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design
> of Interstellar Spacecraft
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ
>
> Section 2
> The Creation and Destruction of Energy
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ
>
> Section 3
> The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
>
> Section 4
> The Nature of Explosion
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ
>
> Section 5
> The forces involved in rotational motion
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ
>
> *******
>
> 2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
> IFE - 2 Experimental setups
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
> IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
> IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
> IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
> IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
> IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
> IFE - 8 New Physics
>
> ****
> The physics aphorisms of Arindam
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ
>
> The cause of gravity
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
>
> Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ
>
> Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ
>
> *****

Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused to
make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His theories
led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now Hubble and Webb
telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant galaxies NOT moving
away at high speeds but going in all directions.

In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.

Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
crackpot.

On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
> the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
> speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
> to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
> theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
> Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
> galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.

I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.

The idea that compulsators and other pulsed-power sources have
arrived to make it so that coilguns are sort of a thing is
not the news. The silicon-controlled-rectifier and some other
ideas of transistor-networks for regulators, then get into notions of
the super-capacitors, and for example the solid-state-supecapacitor
after a sort of MEMS approach. Anyways there's plenty of research
in pulsed-power sources, for things like coilguns, lasers, and so on.
(For power electronics.)

The L-principle and light's constant velocity is pretty
well-established, that there's space-contraction and fall-gravity
is a different thing, here I think that Mr. Arindam sort of
is fighting with SR, when his problem and the usual problem
of everybody else is that actually GR goes in front of SR,
then that while it's true that inflationary cosmology is largely
paint-canned, and what would be dark matter and dark energy are pointing
instead to something like MOND, that the L-principle is still a thing,
only that space-contraction is really a thing.

When you read Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" it really sort
of falls out, there's not much nonsense left in it. Here I read
from Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" in my podcasts' playlists.

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
> wrote: <snip>
>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>
> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
> crackpot.

lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol

𝗔𝗹𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁_𝗘𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆...𝘂𝗺...𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝘂𝗺...𝘂𝗴𝗹𝘆_𝗮𝘀𝘀...𝗛𝗨𝗦𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗗.
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/deIICK5dilFK

In sci.physics Obed Erdélyi <ededeoy@ozlo.hu> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>> wrote: <snip>
>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>
>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>> crackpot.
>
> lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol
>
> 𝗔𝗹𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁_𝗘𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆...𝘂𝗺...𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝘂𝗺...𝘂𝗴𝗹𝘆_𝗮𝘀𝘀...𝗛𝗨𝗦𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗗.
> https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/deIICK5dilFK

Yet another babbling 10 year old...

On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>> wrote: <snip>
>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>
>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>> crackpot.
>
> lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol
>

Actually Einstein's sexy, and his long-time live-in lover
was a Black jazz singer from New York City.

What you see is what you get though,
you are what you eat, as they say.

All irrelevant because Einstein is just a
model philosopher of a model physicist.

And what was in his pipe, ....

As followers of Einstein we heartily lionize the guy.

And don't have much yet disgust for nym-shifting troll-o-mites.

Or dopes that don't get it.

Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>>> wrote: <snip>
>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>>
>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>> crackpot.

I do understand they are nonsense. I also understand that Einsteinians are
either corrupt or stupid or both; so until they die out or fade out there
is no hope for physics. As they rule.

-

> All irrelevant because Einstein is just a
> model philosopher of a model physicist.

For bringing back Aristotle into the works, by making Earth still and the
centre of the universe, Einstein certainly deserves his high status from
the Dark Age types.

While he may be a philosopher of sorts, as from the pre-Einstein
scientific point of view he can be considered the king of anti-science, as
he managed to push imagination of the weirdest kind to trump reality. That
is some achievement, for which he deserves the highest censure, from
genuine scientists.

On the other hand, from the Dark Age types, he was the hero, for he
managed to keep the Jewish metaphysics going when that was faced with
extinction from the reality of aether, or aum, from the discovery of
electromagntic waves.
>
> And what was in his pipe, ....
>
>
>
> As followers of Einstein we heartily lionize the guy.

Yes, as god-clown-baby.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote: <snip>
>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>>> crackpot.
>
> I do understand they are nonsense.

That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
and science in general, crackpot.

<snip crackpot babble>

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>>>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote: <snip>
>>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>>>> crackpot.
>>
>> I do understand they are nonsense.

> That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
> and science in general, crackpot.

> <snip crackpot babble>

Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>> crackpot.
>>
>> lol, the Einstine was a gay, lol
>
> Actually Einstein's sexy, and his long-time live-in lover
> was a Black jazz singer from New York City.

shut the feck up, idiot. You don't know what you say and what you do. To be
gay is a shame in physics. You imbeciles of west are so brainwashed by your
deepen corrupt 𝗸𝗵𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿_𝗴𝗼𝘆𝗺 driven gov, that you don't know what is wrong in
this world. I fart in your coffee, lol.

𝗔𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿_𝗘𝗨_𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱_𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽_𝗞𝗶𝗲𝘃_𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆-𝗮𝗴𝗲_𝗺𝗲𝗻
Lithuania could follow Poland’s lead in dealing with fighting-age
Ukrainians, the defense chief has said
https://r%74.com/russia/596603-lithuania-ukrainian-men-mobilization/

Ha ha ha! Borrell's utopian civilised EU garden. Enjoy the superior
European values, Ukrainians. Enjoy it.

These shameless EU Zionist controlled lapdogs are literally killing the
Orthodox population of so-called Ukraine. The Jew cabal of Kiev should be
rounded up and sent to the front as there is no more cannon fodder left.If

I were Ukrainian, and I were expelled from a supposed democratic civilized
peaceful independent EU country, and obliged to go back to my land, I'd end
up joining the Russian army

The EU on its best protecting human rights (LOL)...

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>>> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>>>>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote: <snip>
>>>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>>>>> crackpot.
>>>
>>> I do understand they are nonsense.
>
>> That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
>> and science in general, crackpot.
>
>> <snip crackpot babble>
>
> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

And yet another 9 year old pipes up...

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>
> And yet another 9 year old pipes up...

<img src="
CFNpZlQ5xxWYG5EncgRTf5W14locQi3qM+haKQleNQ4CMGmYopQrr9OYOeP4NBm5tN52hDnIb1LjyxuPeKQ+hwKkeQviOhaXeSqu8RdYB9/
HmP8BtiJufnj/BupjSRAFFGwKZ8UIrLaq/GOeodTdkBA2HhZLkw/
Ct7RC0+wLcb9VgWY+15EVmOTJKPkM9UcjOb8VzxTj9wYuopozxRxPRvu7wX+B04I/
XqH4J9RwHHnlF9Bb2H5qSB5vNkSEAsAZJdTg59s0gFAcymjS+lDAse9QUaedS7V7dSj3TD4TRs0BYwpZiB6Rjw38QwGbAsuDMZ4N+gFx5u4S14yR8mu6039GXERvNTtsFYQGdOcuDNDKFZFQL2cD2C//
FURCa755dA7Q0ZMCusoG2IHRWm5dL8pAkKTAOm/
d6UCp6XwBsmvdZqWrbyfcC5S2AZU9NHw5FBUE12vAlYFsPyCGrLvv0A2K8haTiIUXn0CCdQ1QCiVex8GSC35KwIEdyhlgnbA+OlUOrwqMmu0tYb0AHvsVWqgLUohkhkJyle7pTH49A2UFOOHPx+yIVbDfdZdN9FdBEmneqV88QBKtzyGWQ6CCHnD4iTsQFrxy5/
TedSQ4ifz6ghJTKc0WAv8WwoFvdFEgrNNUkNgs9IE0VcHupvJu8V6mCSThospTR6jkuM9n2SD8BfxMrYG/
iGfDAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC"/>

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 26/04/2024 à 06:40, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>>>> On 04/25/2024 12:43 PM, Obed Erdélyi wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics.electromag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote: <snip>
>>>>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just because you can't understand them doesn't make them wrong,
>>>>>>> crackpot.
>>>>
>>>> I do understand they are nonsense.
>>
>>> That is your understanding because you are utterly clueless about math
>>> and science in general, crackpot.
>>
>>> <snip crackpot babble>
>>
>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

> And yet another 9 year old pipes up...

Quod Erat Demonstrandum

bt

On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.

They invest decades of their lives in that too, cause penis is good for
them.

In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>
>
>
> Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
> look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.

Yep, the Dunning-Kruger poster boy's insults are grade school level at
best, i.e. about the time he stopped learning things and started making
them up instead.

On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
> In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
>> look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.
>
> Yep, the Dunning-Kruger poster boy's insults are grade school level at
> best, i.e. about the time he stopped learning things and started making
> them up instead.
>

Who knows... maybe they really do have something like the equivalent
of physics or mathematics or engineering degrees of the science
variety, and their juvenile delinquency is really just so much
so how the academic journals and learned treatises and the application
and driving the world and making their very smart phones, should be,
that really it's that learned, educated, genteel people should
act more like them, than the other way around.

Nah, that's ridiculous, they're idiots and incompetents of the pest variety.

You know, bathing in cold water really does cause the
scrotum to withdraw a bit, the function of the scrotum
is to keep the testicles a few degrees cooler than usual
body heat, because being too hot is bad for spermatozoa.

Then, to scrutinize, is a word meaning to very thoroughly
inspect, for example "you better look like your balls
depend on it". The inscrutable then means "don't trust it".

"There are only twelve, or maybe thirteen,
jokes in the world. Five or more of these
are too dirty to tell: and everybody's
known them all since third grade."

"Gee, Gus, ..., shouldn't we go to dinner first?"

It's kind of like "Uncle Al" used to say.

Well, Uncle Al said Eotvos experiment wouldn't have a negative result,
then as with regards to whether it was accelerating, ....

I suppose of course they took that into account.

You know they got that Cavendish lab bit thing
going on again these days, ....

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253802/

"Because the three parts of the Einstein equivalence principle discussed
above are so very different in their empirical consequences, it is
tempting to regard them as independent theoretical principles. On the
other hand, any complete and self-consistent gravitation theory must
possess suffcient [sic] mathematical machinery to make predictions for
the outcomes of experiments that test each principle, and because there
are limits to the number of ways that gravitation can be meshed with the
special relativistic laws of physics, one might not be surprised if
there were theoretical connections between the three sub-principles."

"If Schiff’s conjecture is correct, then Eötvös experiments may be seen
as the direct empirical foundation for EEP, hence for the interpretation
of gravity as a curved-spacetime phenomenon. Of course, a rigorous proof
of such a conjecture is impossible (indeed, some special
counter-examples are known), yet a number of powerful “plausibility”
arguments can be formulated."

Yeah, yeah, I know. "Caca".

You know if you cup your hand in your armpit
and flap your arm you can make music? Also,
there's an easy way to test your IQ, just see
if you hand is as big as your face by placing
it on your face.

Also, there's, "so, so, suck, your toe:
all the way to Mexico". (I forget the rest.)

Said to people who say "so" too much, ...,
which isn't wrong, ....

That and, "that", ....

"These limits are sufficiently tight to rule out a number of non-metric
theories of gravity thought previously to be viable."

The, uh nerd fight or idiot fight, this is a good one,
what you do is sort of put arm over arm, and put the lower
arm's hand, on your face, so the other arm is your free hand.
So what you do is both sides assume idiot fight stance
then go at it. Whoever removes their hand from their face loses.

Won't be finding that on Wiki, ..., they've invented many new ones.
(The retard fight.) Of course both parties have to giggle freely
throughout the match.

"The consensus at present is that there is no credible experimental
evidence for a fifth force of nature."

"Nevertheless, theoretical evidence continues to mount that EEP is
likely to be violated at some level, whether by quantum gravity effects,
by effects arising from string theory, or by hitherto undetected
interactions, albeit at levels well below those that motivated the
fifth-force searches. Roughly speaking, in addition to the pure
Einsteinian gravitational interaction, which respects EEP, theories such
as string theory predict other interactions which do not. In string
theory, for example, the existence of such EEP-violating fields is
assured, but the theory is not yet mature enough to enable calculation
of their strength (relative to gravity), or their range (whether they
are long range, like gravity, or short range, like the nuclear and weak
interactions, and thus too short-range to be detectable)."

"Therefore for the remainder of this article, we shall turn our
attention exclusively to metric theories of gravity, which assume that
(i) there exists a symmetric metric, (ii) test bodies follow geodesics
of the metric, and (iii) in local Lorentz frames, the non-gravitational
laws of physics are those of special relativity."

Well you see now Lorentz-Fitzgerald frames are different
than "SR-local Lorentz frames". This is a "GR first" theory.

"What distinguishes one metric theory from another, therefore, is the
number and kind of gravitational fields it contains in addition to the
metric, and the equations that determine the structure and evolution of
these fields. From this viewpoint, one can divide all metric theories of
gravity into two fundamental classes: “purely dynamical” and
“prior-geometric”."

So, the electrical field and contraction effects, in it,
that's again sort of courtesy FitzGerald now with Maxwell,
it's a space-contraction bit.

GR first: it's a space-contraction bit. SR is "local".

Gravity with a metric theory thus Lorentzian?

Sure, ..., Lorentz-Galileo, Lorentz-Fitzgerald,
bit of Lorentz-Fitzgerald-Maxwell, ....

And what does Einstein say? Einstein says,
"gravity is down, straight down,
and you can call it curved."

"By discussing metric theories of gravity from this broad point of view,
it is possible to draw some general conclusions about the nature of
gravity in different metric theories, conclusions that are reminiscent
of the Einstein equivalence principle, but that are subsumed under the
name “strong equivalence principle”."

Of course in science there's not "conjectures verified",
it's "theory's falsified".

"Thus the metric and the equations of motion for matter become the
primary entities for calculating observable effects, and all that
distinguishes one metric theory from another is the particular way in
which matter and possibly other gravitational fields generate the metric."

"In the current version of the PPN formalism, summarized in Box 2, ten
parameters are used, chosen in such a manner that they measure or
indicate general properties of metric theories of gravity (Table ​
(Table2).2). Under reasonable assumptions about the kinds of potentials
that can be present at post-Newtonian order (basically only Poisson-like
potentials), one finds that ten PPN parameters exhaust the possibilities."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5253802/table/Tab2/?report=objectonly

"The framework uses a nearly globally Lorentz coordinate system in which
the coordinates are (t, x1, x2, x3). Three-dimensional, Euclidean vector
notation is used throughout."

"A large number of alternative theories of gravity predict gravitational
wave emission substantially different from that of general relativity,
in strong disagreement with observations of the binary pulsar (see Sec. 7)."

"Because the scalar fields are generally massive, the potentials in the
post-Newtonian limit will be modified by Yukawa-like terms."

"General relativity: The metric g is the sole dynamical field, and the
theory contains no arbitrary functions or parameters, apart from the
value of the Newtonian coupling constant G, which is measurable in
laboratory experiments."

That's a pretty great little survey, "The Confrontation
between General Relativity and Experiment".

"It is interesting to note that the classic derivations of the
deflection of light that use only the principle of equivalence or the
corpuscular theory of light yield only the “1/2” part of the coefficient
in front of the expression in Eq. (30). But the result of these
calculations is the deflection of light relative to local straight
lines, as established for example by rigid rods; however, because of
space curvature around the Sun, determined by the PPN parameter γ, local
straight lines are bent relative to asymptotic straight lines far from
the Sun by just enough to yield the remaining factor “γ/2”. The first
factor “1/2” holds in any metric theory, the second “γ/2” varies from
theory to theory. Thus, calculations that purport to derive the full
deflection using the equivalence principle alone are incorrect."

Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

In other words, the pretentious mediocrities with zero creativity are horrendously jealous of those with creative powers, and they show their unhappiness by hurling abuse, at their politest. (When not polite they gang up and become killers. Examples abound, from Brutus to Chapman.). That works at the national and tribal levels as well.

We doggies deplore such peculiar treachery. Can't understand it. Peculiar characteristic of the drynoses.

> Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
> look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.

Wogs ain't us? Or is it just the incompetence of the person under scrutiny?

> They invest decades of their lives in that too, cause penis is good for
> them.

Indeed. Sour grapes, you mean?

bt

Le 27/04/2024 à 14:35, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.

That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
proportion to the pee it generates".
Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to
be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or
Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
bump me off? How much raised so far?

>>> Hehe :) Penis? Penis is something "Pennino"s of this land of the brave
>>> look up to and never reach, so they just become their groupies.

What? Wogs ain't us?

Or is it just the JimPee?
I don't suppose he is a Chosen Chappie, then. Just a bitter wannabe.

>> Yep, the Dunning-Kruger poster boy's insults are grade school level at
>> best, i.e. about the time he stopped learning things and started making
>> them up instead.

When one (and the only one, that is, Arindam) has learnt enough from his
unique education and experiences to distinguish between right and wrong,
good and bad; that is to say, when such a one is an absolutist and no kind
of slimy lying unethical relativist; then yes, that one has to start on
his own and find out the secrets of the universe without reference to the
ruling blind termites screeching out "Dunning Kluger" from their
impressive monuments (Oxford, Harvard, etc.); while amiably sauntering
past them as a brontosaurus trying not to harm anthills.

Penisnino's Law in full flow, below

- Great Pee snipped -

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 27/04/2024 à 14:35, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>> On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>
> That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
> proportion to the pee it generates".
> Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
> only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to
> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or
> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
> btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
> bump me off? How much raised so far?

Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
science is wrong, crackpot?

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 27/04/2024 à 14:35, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 04/26/2024 06:47 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/26/24 00:41, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> Penisnino's Law: Smaller the penis, greater the pee.
>>
>> That sounds more elegant than "the size of the penis is in inverse
>> proportion to the pee it generates".
>> Or in other words, the jealous mediocrity, incapable of creativity, can
>> only shower abuse upon the creative genius. At best! So the Arindam has to
>> be careful about the Roachies and the Penisninos, who could turn Brutus or
>> Chapman given the chance. Better to get peed upon than to bleed, what.
>> btw Roachie, what's the latest about your crowdfunding from physicists to
>> bump me off? How much raised so far?

> Is that the results of your expriment that shows that conventional
> science is wrong, crackpot?

It would appear so, Penisnino.

What great honour for Arindam, to be a human sacrifice for good, proper, decent, honest, clever, clear and new revolutionary physics, now in the grip of institutionalized frauds and their supportive cretins.

That they are all global and all-powerful makes them all the more worthy of contempt.

Not that Arindam wants to die, as he has very much to live for and is extremely happy with what he has got. Never think he will commit suicide, Penisnino. He may have done that had he any regard left for the ruling penisninos_allsorts_everywhere, but as such is not the case, he remains serene and productive. Many more inventions are on the way, one better than the other.

bt

Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
>> the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
>> speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
>> to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
>> theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
>> Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
>> galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.

> I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
> He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.

Coilguns are not railguns. Totally different technologies.
Arindam invented a new type of railgun with parallel rails spread wide apart, heavy armature and low voltage requirement with low reistance for high currents.
That design has been stolen by the US Navy and employed in its most modern ships.

That theft follows that of his discovery of googling, and so many others.
As Arindam had expected, really.

> The idea that compulsators and other pulsed-power sources have
> arrived to make it so that coilguns are sort of a thing is
> not the news. The silicon-controlled-rectifier and some other
> ideas of transistor-networks for regulators, then get into notions of
> the super-capacitors, and for example the solid-state-supecapacitor
> after a sort of MEMS approach. Anyways there's plenty of research
> in pulsed-power sources, for things like coilguns, lasers, and so on.
> (For power electronics.)

Arindam's discovery following his invention was that the Lorenz force has no equal and opposite reaction.
It is one of the most important human discoveries, matching that of fire, the wheel, and electricity.
That updates Newton's laws of motion - the first and the third, as Arindam had stated back in 2000 in his book "To the stars!".

> The L-principle and light's constant velocity is pretty
> well-established,

Light's constant velocity is a fallacy, totally wrong.
Doppler effect results from change in velocity of light.
Thus f(v)=(c+v)/wavelenth
The MMI experiment actually shows light speed varies with the speed of the emitter; when it is clear that the equipment moves along with the Earth, so the path lengths taken by the two beams are actually different from what they are taken to be NOW; so when that error is corrected it wil be found that nulls MUST be there when the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter, as was thought THEN.

> that there's space-contraction and fall-gravity
> is a different thing, here I think that Mr. Arindam sort of
> is fighting with SR,

I am fighting with all sorts of pests: physicists, professors, politicians, plutocrats and presstitues. These guys love SR, it is their religion, and Einstein is their beloved God-Clown-Baby provding them with nice fat careers/fame/wealth/etc.

when his problem and the usual problem
> of everybody else is that actually GR goes in front of SR,

GR is the most Gorgeous Rubbish - a total fraud where the optical effect of lensing of starlight around the denser outer atmosphere of the Sun is supposed to prove the ridiculous notion of "gravitational lensing". A most shameless fraud.

SR is of course, Special Rubbish.

> then that while it's true that inflationary cosmology is largely
> paint-canned, and what would be dark matter and dark energy are pointing
> instead to something like MOND, that the L-principle is still a thing,
> only that space-contraction is really a thing.

> When you read Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" it really sort
> of falls out, there's not much nonsense left in it. Here I read
> from Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" in my podcasts' playlists.

The most disgusting religion of them all, this e=mcc=hv stuff.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

bt (Arindam's ghostly cyberdogs)

In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
>> On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
>>> the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
>>> speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
>>> to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
>>> theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
>>> Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
>>> galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.
>
>
>> I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
>> He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.
>
> Coilguns are not railguns. Totally different technologies.
> Arindam invented a new type of railgun with parallel rails spread wide apart, heavy armature and low voltage requirement with low reistance for high currents.
> That design has been stolen by the US Navy and employed in its most modern ships.

Wrong on oh so many counts.

After 15 years and $500 million in research, the US Navy gave up on
railguns in 2021.

Railguns were never deployed on Navy ships other than for testing.