From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
post.

But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.

Note, what follows below is basically from my book "To the stars!"
published online in 2000. It is about moving a body with internal force

With no assistance from neutrinos, let me add! :-)
While it is impossible to have neutrino sources, one can pass a huge
current through a moving conductor.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

****

Gedanken experiment.
Consider a rectangular parallelepiped box. The box is closed and
isolated from the outside.
Let A be one of the faces (walls) of the box and let B be the opposite
wall. Let X be the direction that goes from A to B.
Suppose that, with the help of some device attached to wall A, a body of
mass m is thrown from this wall A towards wall B where it hits and
bounces back. The law of conservation of momentum predicts that the
"throw" will necessarily produce a recoil of the box
that will acquire a momentum increase in the semi direction =E2=80=93X
that equals (and cancels) the momentum along the semi direction +X
acquired by the body of mass m during the "throw".
Similarly, when the body hits the wall B, it will give to the box a
momentum increase (along the semi direction +X) that equals and cancels
the momentum change (along the semi direction -X) that the wall B gives
to the body making it bounce back. Therefore, on the whole, mainstream
physics predicts that the box (including all its content, i.e. the body
m and the device attached to the box that throws the mass along AB) will
not suffer any net impulse. Therefore the energy released by the device
that throws the mass cannot be used to propel the box (i.e. to change
its initial velocity relative to an inertial reference frame).
Suppose now that an intense source of neutrinos is located at the center
of the box.

- snip -

************************

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
> post.
>
> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.

And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
educated and sane moderator.

<snip kook babble>

Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>> post.
>>
>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>
> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
> educated and sane moderator.

Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
evils on the planet.

2 sec video of gun in action
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/pcb.7521439881217077/350814810783223

explained in

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

with no help from tachyons, baryons, bosons, photons, neutrinos, big bang,
etc. etc. etc. :-)

cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Le 03/04/2024 à 13:28, Arindam Banerjee a écrit :
> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>> post.
>>>
>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>
>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>> educated and sane moderator.
>
> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the cult
> of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest evils on the
> planet.
>
> 2 sec video of gun in action
>
> https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/pcb.7521439881217077/350814810783223
>
> explained in
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

"With bolts of lightning, o Indra, King of Gods, is formed your necklace."
>
> with no help from tachyons, baryons, bosons, photons, neutrinos, big bang, etc.
> etc. etc. :-)

Nor trolls, pixies, fairies, unicorns, little green men from Uranus, etc.
Pen(is)nino.
>
> cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

Up Newton, Down Einstein!

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>> post.
>>>
>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>
>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>> educated and sane moderator.
>
> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
> cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
> evils on the planet.

Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.

Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>>> post.
>>>>
>>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>>
>>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>>> educated and sane moderator.
>>
>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
>> cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
>> evils on the planet.
>
> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.

Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
Up Newton, up Tesla!
Down Einstein, down Hawking.
Up with science and technology,
down with bungling and lying.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

On 4/3/2024 9:38 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of
>>> the cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the
>>> greatest evils on the planet.
>>
>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>
> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
> Up Newton, up Tesla!
> Down Einstein, down Hawking.
> Up with science and technology, down with bungling and lying.

I see that not only are you still a crackpot, but you are apparently
proud of being a flaming crackpot.

Don't ever change.

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>>>> post.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>>>
>>>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>>>> educated and sane moderator.
>>>
>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
>>> cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
>>> evils on the planet.
>>
>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>
> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.

Anyone using phrases like "supreme truth" and "priest of that cult" is
obviously a crackpot.

<snip crackpot raving>

Le 04/04/2024 à 12:23, Volney a écrit :
> On 4/3/2024 9:38 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of
>>>> the cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the
>>>> greatest evils on the planet.
>>>
>>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>>
>> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
>> Up Newton, up Tesla!
>> Down Einstein, down Hawking.
>> Up with science and technology, down with bungling and lying.
>
> I see that not only are you still a crackpot, but you are apparently
> proud of being a flaming crackpot.

I see that you have not quit lying, Moroney.
That is impossible for an e=mcc chanter.

> Don't ever change.

You can. Really. Won't be easy for you to stop lying. Courage, Moroney!
You can be an inspiration to the entire global community of liars calling
themselves physicists.

First step - see how inertia is violated with my most recent railgun
experiments.
Do you think I am pushing the armature here?

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Le 04/04/2024 à 12:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>>>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>>>>> educated and sane moderator.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
>>>> cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
>>>> evils on the planet.
>>>
>>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>>
>> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
>
> Anyone using phrases like "supreme truth" and "priest of that cult" is
> obviously a crackpot.

That the cult of relativity, with Einstein as its God-ShowBaby-Wiseguy, is
the unquestionable supreme truth for the "physics" world is obvious.
Anybody disputing the theology of this cult (basically having as an
article of faith a limited, twisted universe where rabid conjectures
posing as theories boosted by theabuse of mathematics and the prestige of
nukes must mean much more than obvious facts, such as railguns do not have
electrical reactions) has to be treated as an outcast.

Labeling is the way out for the e=mcc=hv chanters.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 04/04/2024 à 12:23, Volney a écrit :
>> On 4/3/2024 9:38 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of
>>>>> the cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the
>>>>> greatest evils on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>>>
>>> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
>>> Up Newton, up Tesla!
>>> Down Einstein, down Hawking.
>>> Up with science and technology, down with bungling and lying.
>>
>> I see that not only are you still a crackpot, but you are apparently
>> proud of being a flaming crackpot.
>
> I see that you have not quit lying, Moroney.
> That is impossible for an e=mcc chanter.

Anybody that uses phrases like "e=mcc chanter" is obviously a crackpot.

<snip>

> First step - see how inertia is violated with my most recent railgun
> experiments.

Funny, no one else's railguns violate inertia. Perhaps you don't know
how to conduct a proper experiment.

<snip crackpot babble>

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 04/04/2024 à 12:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 22:31, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 09:46, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> From a post in sci.physics.research, a moderated group where I cannot
>>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it looks like they are getting there, with my ideas relating to
>>>>>>> inertia violation involving lack of reaction in electromagnetic rail guns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this is why you can not post to moderated groups which have an
>>>>>> educated and sane moderator.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed, but they are neither sane nor moderated - they are nutjobs of the
>>>>> cult of relativity, and by obstructing scientific progress, the greatest
>>>>> evils on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone using the phrase "cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.
>>>
>>> Anyone opposing that supreme truth is a priest of that cult.
>>
>> Anyone using phrases like "supreme truth" and "priest of that cult" is
>> obviously a crackpot.
>
> That the cult of relativity, with Einstein as its God-ShowBaby-Wiseguy, is

Anyone using phrases like "the cult of relativity" is obviously a crackpot.

<snip crackpot babble>