Rocksolid Light - sci.astro.amateur - Re: Professional astronomers; watch your back

Re: Professional astronomers; watch your back

<efd8ceaa-69fb-42d5-b643-967420bd705dn@googlegroups.com>

http://rslight.i2p/tech/article-flat.php?id=11108&group=sci.astro.amateur#11108

copy link Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5641:b0:66d:365:58f4 with SMTP id mh1-20020a056214564100b0066d036558f4mr298109qvb.8.1697367330998;
Sun, 15 Oct 2023 03:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:3786:0:b0:56c:86f2:ae14 with SMTP id
r128-20020a4a3786000000b0056c86f2ae14mr13445148oor.0.1697367330573; Sun, 15
Oct 2023 03:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 03:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4e603468-4caa-417d-8dc3-1ee5f15160a2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.207.234.185; posting-account=tS_DdwkAAABh2_lUXXZvPfbiutm4lA38
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.207.234.185
References: <a95c55ac-48e1-4205-a32b-8f2cc12cdc7bn@googlegroups.com>
<a8da0ef5-d59e-43bd-a4a3-f74e78fd7c18n@googlegroups.com> <4e603468-4caa-417d-8dc3-1ee5f15160a2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <efd8ceaa-69fb-42d5-b643-967420bd705dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Professional astronomers; watch your back
From: wsnell01@hotmail.com (W)
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 10:55:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2687

by: W - Sun, 15 Oct 2023 10:55 UTC

On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 4:59:52 PM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 October 2023 at 09:11:05 UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 12:58:03 AM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
> > > https://phys.org/news/2023-10-supernova-ai.html
> >
> > If astronomy stopped when supernovae were found, this would be a
> > problem. Since, instead, detecting supernovae is just the first step,
> > and the reason we want to find them is so that we can observe them
> > in detail to be able to draw scientific conclusions about them...
> >
> > the threat of machines replacing astronomers is still quite distant.
> >
> > I mean, if this AI stuff were really any good, it would have proved the
> > Riemann hypothesis by now!
> >
> > John Savard
> There was an accusation that a documentary done recently contained a faked (A.I.) photo. Showed a group of men in the late 1800's. One guy who presumably should have
> been holding a mug instead can be seen with the mug hovering in mid-air in front of him. A.I. isn't perfect.

There is usually a "report button" on most social media sites.

Use it every time that you suspect a faked "photo" in what is supposed to be non-fiction.

"AI" has trouble drawing hands, for some reason. For now, that's a feature, not a bug.

As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.

tech / sci.astro.amateur / Re: Professional astronomers; watch your back

tech / sci.astro.amateur / Re: Professional astronomers; watch your back

Subject	Author
Professional astronomers; watch your back	W