Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Quantum Mechanics is God's version of "Trust me."


devel / comp.arch.embedded / Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

SubjectAuthor
* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
|+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
|| +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
|| |+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortTheo
|| ||`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
|| |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
|| | `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
|| `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||   +- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortHans-Bernhard_Bröker
||    +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortTheo
||    |+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||+- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortTheo
||    ||+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||    |||`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||| `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||    |||  +- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||    |||  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    |||   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||    |||    `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    |||     `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
||    ||`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    || `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||  +- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortGeorge Neuner
||    ||   +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   |+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortJim Jackson
||    ||   ||+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   |||+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   |||| `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  | `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  |   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |    +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortJim Jackson
||    ||   ||||  |    |+- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  |    |`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |    `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  |     `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |      `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  |       `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  |        `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||  |         `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   ||||  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDavid Brown
||    ||   ||||   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||    +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDimiter_Popoff
||    ||   ||||    |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||||    | `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDimiter_Popoff
||    ||   ||||    `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDavid Brown
||    ||   |||`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   ||`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   | `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   |  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   |   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   |    `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   |     `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||   |      `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||    `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||     `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||      `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||       `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||        `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||         `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||          `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||           `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||            `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||             +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||             |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortClifford Heath
||    ||             | +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||             | |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortClifford Heath
||    ||             | | `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||             | |  `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortClifford Heath
||    ||             | |   `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||             | |    +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortJim Jackson
||    ||             | |    |`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    ||             | |    `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortClifford Heath
||    ||             | `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDon Y
||    ||             `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 Portb...@gmx.com
||    ||              `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||    |`- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortHans-Bernhard_Bröker
||    `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
||     `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortHans-Bernhard_Bröker
|`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortHerbert Kleebauer
| +- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortHerbert Kleebauer
| `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
+- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortUwe Bonnes
|`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
| `* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortNiklas Holsti
|  `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
|`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
| +* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortPaul Rubin
| |`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortRick C
| `- Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortDavid Brown
+* Boxed MCU with RS-232 PortTheo
`* Boxed MCU with RS-232 Portpozz

Pages:1234567
Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

<tqgkeu$2j5bu$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

http://rslight.i2p/devel/article-flat.php?id=2144&group=comp.arch.embedded#2144

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: blockedofcourse@foo.invalid (Don Y)
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 05:05:46 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <tqgkeu$2j5bu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f1d09e6f-688d-4a73-9a37-a4a58de6a3a9n@googlegroups.com>
<HJl*VBG8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87ilh3try3.fsf@nightsong.com>
<GJl*KBK8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<3fbec746-63e2-4f82-8fc8-e8179936b49bn@googlegroups.com>
<IJl*grQ8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <877cxgsho8.fsf@nightsong.com>
<tqfmsk$2eg02$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:05:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="43b6922192a4fce4d99da8163a54bb27";
logging-data="2725246"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DODhZnXTMkEiZg3NMKLHy"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CKLvLNQgkind7NSZffnmAVYlzEQ=
In-Reply-To: <tqfmsk$2eg02$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Don Y - Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:05 UTC

On 1/20/2023 8:41 PM, Don Y wrote:
> ISTM that the entry-level product would be something with an ethernet
> (or BT) port and ____________.  Like a 1/2/3/etc. port terminal server
> to bridge that obsolescent technology (EIA232) to more modern comms.
> "You mean you have to connect that device directly to the machine
> that USES it???"

I've one of these in my toy chest:

<https://www.zdnet.com/article/shrunken-linux-enter-the-cerfcube/>

Of course, $400 and 20 years ago is likely a non-starter!

(and, as one of the six faces is explicitly omitted, I wonder if
it qualifies as "boxed"?)

Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

<tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

http://rslight.i2p/devel/article-flat.php?id=2145&group=comp.arch.embedded#2145

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!NZ87pNe1TKxNDknVl4tZhw.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Subject: Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:02:29 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <f1d09e6f-688d-4a73-9a37-a4a58de6a3a9n@googlegroups.com> <HJl*VBG8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87ilh3try3.fsf@nightsong.com> <GJl*KBK8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3fbec746-63e2-4f82-8fc8-e8179936b49bn@googlegroups.com> <tqelsi$19m5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <04d9b943-9b70-4f7a-a674-a3a4a627a1dan@googlegroups.com> <tqevgt$27ml6$1@dont-email.me> <b8da32a0-5f0b-47a8-9afd-9cc56dcc82b6n@googlegroups.com> <tqfgsj$1pj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ff710910-5784-47c8-aa7a-be3a7eaec49an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="9190"; posting-host="NZ87pNe1TKxNDknVl4tZhw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: tin/2.4.5-20201224 ("Glen Albyn") (Linux/5.10.0-9-amd64 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cnoiZnTunZg/Ak35rbuRzQKSjOM=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:02 UTC

Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 8:58:49 PM UTC-5, anti...@math.uni.wroc.pl wrote:
> > Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 4:02:27 PM UTC-5, Dimiter wrote:
> > > > On 1/20/2023 22:37, Rick C wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:17:59 PM UTC-5, Herbert Kleebauer wrote:
> > > > >> On 19.01.2023 19:06, Rick C wrote:
<snip>
> > > My experience with Alibaba is not the same as yours. With Ebay, I can dispute a sale and get a refund. Alibaba spent literally months demanding more and more things from me, many which made no sense because of the language barrier. In the end, they said I failed to prove the vendor was lying when he said he shipped the item listed. Photos were not good enough. They wanted a video for some reason. Alibaba simply does not support their customers, so I don't use them. Ebay is worth while, but some things sold are perpetually fake, or crap and you have to buy them to find out, then make the "return", which the vendor is required to pay for, so they often say keep it.
> > >
> > > I even bought crap wire on Ebay from a vendor relatively local. The actual wire gauge was about three numbers below the claimed AWG. Bought 20 gauge and got 23 gauge. Bought 18 gauge and got 21 gauge, etc. I was getting the refund, so I thought I'd try seeing how far this went. 16 gauge was actually 19 gauge and 12 gauge, was actually 15 gauge. The vendor could not say they didn't know, the wire insulation has *their* name on it! So it's a custom marked product. How could they not know they are selling mislabeled wire?
> > >
> > > Yeah, they all sell crap. I just find it possible to get a refund from Ebay. Alibaba, not so much.
> > >
> > IIUC Alibaba is intended for larger transactions and has different
<snip>
> No, they send something, just not anything of value. Aliexpress can't seem to understand the ICs which don't work, are counterfeit and you don't have to test every one on the reel to know they are all crap. The real issue was the language barrier. They don't speak English, rather use automated translators in both directions, so don't understand half of what you are saying. They also don't understand what an IC is and think counterfeit is only for handbags.

My impression was that verndors understood resonably well what I
wrote and answered sensibly. The things were probably too small to
really involve a person from Aliexpress, communication from
Aliexpress looked like canned text. So really no big problem with
Engish, but potentially could be different if matters got more
complicated (more value at stake and vendor contradicting my claims).

BTW: Aliexpress want very much to translate offers into my native
Polish. Compared to English text that they have translations into
Polish are really funny/misleading.

> > Most Aliexpress seller have resonably high volumes. They sell
> > what customers want to buy. It can not be completely non functional,
> > there are not enough fools to support this.
>
> LOL! If they buy counterfeit ICs at $0.05 each, they don't need to sell many at $5.00 to make profit.

In general, probably 1 in 100 customers makes comments dealing with
actual performance of given product. So after 100 sales, if thing is
non-functional you can expect bad opinion and after that more folks
looking at what they get and cascade of more bad opinions. Actually
if thing is completely non-functional I would expect complaints
much earlier. So maybe bad guy can collect few hundreds or maybe
some thousends dollars. If one could do such thing without a cost,
then surely, there would be a lot of folks doing this. But there
is probably some cost setting Aliexpress seller account and if
enetrprise is pure fraud, then Aliexpress is likely to take some
action (say via court or police).

My impression is that complete, pure fraud is not big problem.
Rather, problematic are goods that appear to work but are substandard
or have hidden defects.

> > The problem is
> > that most customers are unable or unwillig to fully examine
> > what they bought. So you get rechargable batteries with
> > completely bogus stated capacity or USB chargers with inflated
> > charging current. I bought a lot of things on Aliexpress
> > but I am trying to keep realistic expectations. I bought
> > few USB chargers knowing that stated current (2.1 A) is
> > much bigger than real one (0.85 A), but they were good enough
> > for my purpose. I bought resistors and small power transistors.
> > My reasoning was that making something that looks like resistor
> > or transistor in small/medium volume is probably more expensive
> > than real resistor/transistor in high volume. And hopefully
> > there are not enough fools to fund high volume manufacturing
> > of fake transistors.
>
> I don't think you understand. There are any number of things that look like the thing they are selling you, which will pass a visual inspection if you close one eye and have no idea what you are looking for. But they are fake. Even a $0.10 transistor has a lot of markup if they only pay $0.001 each for a reject. It might work well enough to light the LED on a transistor tester.

I was writing about basic transitors like 2N3904, BC237 and similar.
AFAICS $0.10 for such transistor is well above market price. Few
years ago 2N3904 from big American distributor was $0.0234 per piece when
you wanted 500. About 10 years ago reputable local distributor had
basic types for equivelent of $0.015 per piece in quantities of 100.
And BF493 was half of that. This distributor had a warehouse and
same day (if order was early enough in the day) or next day shipping.

Chinese seller had batches of 100, with prices of order $1 per batch,
that is $0.01 per transitor. I was a bit curious so I looked at
availability numbers. Apparently he started from 10000 and counter
went relatively fast down. And then restarted from 10000. So
he was selling milions of transitors (10000 times 100 is milion).
I also looked at Farnell. For similar type they had something like
35000 and counters were slowly changing. So Chinese guy had _much_
larger volume than Farnell and almost surely much lower operating cost.

At prices between $0.10 and $0.20 per piece I got few TO-220
powers MOSFETS. They were out of specs and probably rejects:
both Rds_on and junction capacitance was larger than it should
be, so this was not smaller MOSFET relabeled as bigger one.
I consider them good enough for undemanding uses in experimental
circuits. Certainly I would not allow them to get anywhere
near production (too much risk that they would end up in
critical circuits).

> > Well, I got resistors and resonably
> > performing transistors. I can not say if there are some hidden
> > troubles but to the moment I am satisfied with what I bought.
>
> Sure, if you only need crap components, then you are good to go!

If I had extreme requirements, then I would not use 2N3904 or
BC237. But they are good enough for most uses.
> > In the past I bought few STM chips from Chinese sellers.
> > AFAIK those chips were widely used in China, the unit price was
> > much lower than unit price from western distributors, but
> > significantly higher that supposed volume price. So it
> > looked resonable that Chinese seller could sell them at lower
> > margin and still make a profit. And up to now I had no
> > problem with those chips.
> >
> > OTOH if there is advanced/rare western part it would be strange
> > if Chinese seller had some magic cheap source of the part, so
> > I am very suspicious of such offers. Power mosfets were
> > borderline case. Around 2019 I bought packs of 10 from several
> > sellers. Essentially all were out of specs (too large Rds_on). If
> > there were moderate discrepancy I made comments stating real paramenter,
> > in few cases of really large discrepancy I requested partial
> > refund (and got it possibly after a dispute). To say the truth,
> > refunds that I got were probably not worth my time, I did this
> > mostly from feeling of moral duty, to make sure sellers know
> > that there is problem and to discourage them from selling such
> > bad parts.
> >
> > When buying on Aliexpress it is useful to read buyers comments.
> > Especially Russians tend to measure/test bought parts, so you
> > can have resonable idea what you are buying.
>
> I've never found any selling sites with good reviews. Many are made up from whole cloth. I recall when Ebay had some sort of rating system in both directions. There were vendors who would set up buyer accounts and buy things at a penny. Good reviews in both directions and credibility would increase.

There may be something like that at Aliexpress. But I meant actual
text of comments. It would take some effort to make up text that
is belivable and it is not clear what seller would gain. Aliexpress
allow you to view opinions corresponding to given rating, so you
can look up why people give bad rating (while good ratings frequently
came with no text, bad ones usually give some justification).


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

<10bcaae4-401a-489a-9d00-1457a075e6e6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

http://rslight.i2p/devel/article-flat.php?id=2146&group=comp.arch.embedded#2146

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4ea9:0:b0:535:5d2b:41ff with SMTP id ed9-20020ad44ea9000000b005355d2b41ffmr521481qvb.20.1674436323419;
Sun, 22 Jan 2023 17:12:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1014:0:b0:3a7:e5e2:fe2e with SMTP id
z20-20020ac81014000000b003a7e5e2fe2emr1059269qti.155.1674436323089; Sun, 22
Jan 2023 17:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 17:12:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.207.89.54; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.207.89.54
References: <f1d09e6f-688d-4a73-9a37-a4a58de6a3a9n@googlegroups.com>
<HJl*VBG8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87ilh3try3.fsf@nightsong.com>
<GJl*KBK8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3fbec746-63e2-4f82-8fc8-e8179936b49bn@googlegroups.com>
<tqelsi$19m5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <04d9b943-9b70-4f7a-a674-a3a4a627a1dan@googlegroups.com>
<tqevgt$27ml6$1@dont-email.me> <b8da32a0-5f0b-47a8-9afd-9cc56dcc82b6n@googlegroups.com>
<tqfgsj$1pj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ff710910-5784-47c8-aa7a-be3a7eaec49an@googlegroups.com>
<tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <10bcaae4-401a-489a-9d00-1457a075e6e6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port
From: gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com (Rick C)
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:12:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 15533
 by: Rick C - Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:12 UTC

On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:02:34 PM UTC-5, anti...@math.uni.wroc.pl wrote:
> Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 8:58:49 PM UTC-5, anti...@math.uni.wroc.pl wrote:
> > > Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 4:02:27 PM UTC-5, Dimiter wrote:
> > > > > On 1/20/2023 22:37, Rick C wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 1:17:59 PM UTC-5, Herbert Kleebauer wrote:
> > > > > >> On 19.01.2023 19:06, Rick C wrote:
> <snip>
> > > > My experience with Alibaba is not the same as yours. With Ebay, I can dispute a sale and get a refund. Alibaba spent literally months demanding more and more things from me, many which made no sense because of the language barrier. In the end, they said I failed to prove the vendor was lying when he said he shipped the item listed. Photos were not good enough. They wanted a video for some reason. Alibaba simply does not support their customers, so I don't use them. Ebay is worth while, but some things sold are perpetually fake, or crap and you have to buy them to find out, then make the "return", which the vendor is required to pay for, so they often say keep it.
> > > >
> > > > I even bought crap wire on Ebay from a vendor relatively local. The actual wire gauge was about three numbers below the claimed AWG. Bought 20 gauge and got 23 gauge. Bought 18 gauge and got 21 gauge, etc. I was getting the refund, so I thought I'd try seeing how far this went. 16 gauge was actually 19 gauge and 12 gauge, was actually 15 gauge. The vendor could not say they didn't know, the wire insulation has *their* name on it! So it's a custom marked product. How could they not know they are selling mislabeled wire?
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, they all sell crap. I just find it possible to get a refund from Ebay. Alibaba, not so much.
> > > >
> > > IIUC Alibaba is intended for larger transactions and has different
> <snip>
> > No, they send something, just not anything of value. Aliexpress can't seem to understand the ICs which don't work, are counterfeit and you don't have to test every one on the reel to know they are all crap. The real issue was the language barrier. They don't speak English, rather use automated translators in both directions, so don't understand half of what you are saying. They also don't understand what an IC is and think counterfeit is only for handbags.
> My impression was that verndors understood resonably well what I
> wrote and answered sensibly.

I didn't say anything about the vendors not understanding. I'm talking about the dispute process. It is very heavily weighted in favor of the seller and on top of that, they have no language barrier. I had to read their Chinese, which they suddenly started using for the dispute and Alibaba use the translator to communicate with me. Much of the problem I had, was because they were asking me for very silly things, some of which was a language issue, no doubt, but also the fact that they are set up for selling funny clocks, t-shirts and handbags, not technically oriented items.

> The things were probably too small to
> really involve a person from Aliexpress, communication from
> Aliexpress looked like canned text. So really no big problem with
> Engish, but potentially could be different if matters got more
> complicated (more value at stake and vendor contradicting my claims).
>
> BTW: Aliexpress want very much to translate offers into my native
> Polish. Compared to English text that they have translations into
> Polish are really funny/misleading.

Oh, yes! The want very much to do what it takes the close the deal, they just don't care if you get ripped off.

> > > Most Aliexpress seller have resonably high volumes. They sell
> > > what customers want to buy. It can not be completely non functional,
> > > there are not enough fools to support this.
> >
> > LOL! If they buy counterfeit ICs at $0.05 each, they don't need to sell many at $5.00 to make profit.
> In general, probably 1 in 100 customers makes comments dealing with
> actual performance of given product. So after 100 sales, if thing is
> non-functional you can expect bad opinion and after that more folks
> looking at what they get and cascade of more bad opinions.

Alibaba doesn't work that way.

> Actually
> if thing is completely non-functional I would expect complaints
> much earlier. So maybe bad guy can collect few hundreds or maybe
> some thousends dollars. If one could do such thing without a cost,
> then surely, there would be a lot of folks doing this. But there
> is probably some cost setting Aliexpress seller account and if
> enetrprise is pure fraud, then Aliexpress is likely to take some
> action (say via court or police).

Alibaba has virtually no effective rating system. What is there, is easily scammed by generating fake reviews and starting over with a new company name when you get bad reviews. Like Ebay in the early days. Ebay took the matter seriously, and stopping the vendors from being able to blacklist customers because the blue the whistle. I remember sellers threatening me to give good, or no reviews.

> My impression is that complete, pure fraud is not big problem.
> Rather, problematic are goods that appear to work but are substandard
> or have hidden defects.

Your impression is very wrong. "Hidden defects" such as being totally counterfeit, meaning likely some reject part in the same package, that's not even the same part number.

> > > The problem is
> > > that most customers are unable or unwillig to fully examine
> > > what they bought. So you get rechargable batteries with
> > > completely bogus stated capacity or USB chargers with inflated
> > > charging current. I bought a lot of things on Aliexpress
> > > but I am trying to keep realistic expectations. I bought
> > > few USB chargers knowing that stated current (2.1 A) is
> > > much bigger than real one (0.85 A), but they were good enough
> > > for my purpose. I bought resistors and small power transistors.
> > > My reasoning was that making something that looks like resistor
> > > or transistor in small/medium volume is probably more expensive
> > > than real resistor/transistor in high volume. And hopefully
> > > there are not enough fools to fund high volume manufacturing
> > > of fake transistors.
> >
> > I don't think you understand. There are any number of things that look like the thing they are selling you, which will pass a visual inspection if you close one eye and have no idea what you are looking for. But they are fake. Even a $0.10 transistor has a lot of markup if they only pay $0.001 each for a reject. It might work well enough to light the LED on a transistor tester.
> I was writing about basic transitors like 2N3904, BC237 and similar.
> AFAICS $0.10 for such transistor is well above market price.

Dear god! It was just a number to illustrate the idea. Pick you own numbers.

> Few
> years ago 2N3904 from big American distributor was $0.0234 per piece when
> you wanted 500. About 10 years ago reputable local distributor had
> basic types for equivelent of $0.015 per piece in quantities of 100.
> And BF493 was half of that. This distributor had a warehouse and
> same day (if order was early enough in the day) or next day shipping.
>
> Chinese seller had batches of 100, with prices of order $1 per batch,
> that is $0.01 per transitor. I was a bit curious so I looked at
> availability numbers. Apparently he started from 10000 and counter
> went relatively fast down. And then restarted from 10000. So
> he was selling milions of transitors (10000 times 100 is milion).
> I also looked at Farnell. For similar type they had something like
> 35000 and counters were slowly changing. So Chinese guy had _much_
> larger volume than Farnell and almost surely much lower operating cost.
>
> At prices between $0.10 and $0.20 per piece I got few TO-220
> powers MOSFETS. They were out of specs and probably rejects:
> both Rds_on and junction capacitance was larger than it should
> be, so this was not smaller MOSFET relabeled as bigger one.
> I consider them good enough for undemanding uses in experimental
> circuits. Certainly I would not allow them to get anywhere
> near production (too much risk that they would end up in
> critical circuits).

Ok, buy your transistors at Alibaba. Just don't buy anything that requires some real money.

> > > Well, I got resistors and resonably
> > > performing transistors. I can not say if there are some hidden
> > > troubles but to the moment I am satisfied with what I bought.
> >
> > Sure, if you only need crap components, then you are good to go!
> If I had extreme requirements, then I would not use 2N3904 or
> BC237. But they are good enough for most uses.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

<c4a6bdb8-eb49-4c62-82f8-3bd5054c5de7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

http://rslight.i2p/devel/article-flat.php?id=2151&group=comp.arch.embedded#2151

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1c2:b0:3b9:e0b5:1f8e with SMTP id t2-20020a05622a01c200b003b9e0b51f8emr503350qtw.399.1675444972416;
Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:22:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:41c6:0:b0:53b:c24d:d224 with SMTP id
a6-20020ad441c6000000b0053bc24dd224mr678111qvq.56.1675444972197; Fri, 03 Feb
2023 09:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:22:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <10bcaae4-401a-489a-9d00-1457a075e6e6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.207.89.54; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.207.89.54
References: <f1d09e6f-688d-4a73-9a37-a4a58de6a3a9n@googlegroups.com>
<HJl*VBG8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87ilh3try3.fsf@nightsong.com>
<GJl*KBK8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3fbec746-63e2-4f82-8fc8-e8179936b49bn@googlegroups.com>
<tqelsi$19m5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <04d9b943-9b70-4f7a-a674-a3a4a627a1dan@googlegroups.com>
<tqevgt$27ml6$1@dont-email.me> <b8da32a0-5f0b-47a8-9afd-9cc56dcc82b6n@googlegroups.com>
<tqfgsj$1pj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ff710910-5784-47c8-aa7a-be3a7eaec49an@googlegroups.com>
<tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <10bcaae4-401a-489a-9d00-1457a075e6e6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c4a6bdb8-eb49-4c62-82f8-3bd5054c5de7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port
From: gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com (Rick C)
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 17:22:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2640
 by: Rick C - Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:22 UTC

Crap! I posted about this in several forums and got nibbles from a few, including here. I stopped replying because the waters got more murky rather than more clear. So I wanted to wait until I had something more accurate to provide people. I am planning to reply to you too Paul Rubin. I just have some of my own stuff to deal with first.

Meanwhile, someone sent a reply by a means I don't recall. He specifically mentioned that he had designed a product in a similar enclosure to what I want. I think he even mentioned it being IP67. But durned if I can find it. EEVBLOG has the worst messaging facility. You get to see the messages coming to you, but not the messages you send. So no conversational context!

If this jogs anyone's memory, please contact me again.

--

Rick C.

+--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

<48532f8e-8a8e-41e9-becb-3ae931061778n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

http://rslight.i2p/devel/article-flat.php?id=2152&group=comp.arch.embedded#2152

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:13b7:b0:706:6dd9:b7d9 with SMTP id m23-20020a05620a13b700b007066dd9b7d9mr584120qki.111.1675447455414;
Fri, 03 Feb 2023 10:04:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:307:b0:726:c967:264 with SMTP id
s7-20020a05620a030700b00726c9670264mr558711qkm.434.1675447455188; Fri, 03 Feb
2023 10:04:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:04:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c4a6bdb8-eb49-4c62-82f8-3bd5054c5de7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.207.89.54; posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.207.89.54
References: <f1d09e6f-688d-4a73-9a37-a4a58de6a3a9n@googlegroups.com>
<HJl*VBG8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87ilh3try3.fsf@nightsong.com>
<GJl*KBK8y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <3fbec746-63e2-4f82-8fc8-e8179936b49bn@googlegroups.com>
<tqelsi$19m5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <04d9b943-9b70-4f7a-a674-a3a4a627a1dan@googlegroups.com>
<tqevgt$27ml6$1@dont-email.me> <b8da32a0-5f0b-47a8-9afd-9cc56dcc82b6n@googlegroups.com>
<tqfgsj$1pj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ff710910-5784-47c8-aa7a-be3a7eaec49an@googlegroups.com>
<tqhgcl$8v6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <10bcaae4-401a-489a-9d00-1457a075e6e6n@googlegroups.com>
<c4a6bdb8-eb49-4c62-82f8-3bd5054c5de7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <48532f8e-8a8e-41e9-becb-3ae931061778n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port
From: gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com (Rick C)
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:04:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2912
 by: Rick C - Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:04 UTC

On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:22:55 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:
> Crap! I posted about this in several forums and got nibbles from a few, including here. I stopped replying because the waters got more murky rather than more clear. So I wanted to wait until I had something more accurate to provide people. I am planning to reply to you too Paul Rubin. I just have some of my own stuff to deal with first.
>
> Meanwhile, someone sent a reply by a means I don't recall. He specifically mentioned that he had designed a product in a similar enclosure to what I want. I think he even mentioned it being IP67. But durned if I can find it.. EEVBLOG has the worst messaging facility. You get to see the messages coming to you, but not the messages you send. So no conversational context!
>
> If this jogs anyone's memory, please contact me again.

Nevermind. I found the email. I will be meeting with my brother this weekend to figure out how to proceed. Thanks for your interest.

--

Rick C.

+--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209


devel / comp.arch.embedded / Re: Boxed MCU with RS-232 Port

Pages:1234567
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor