-- (DRAFT 4) INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON A PLAUSIBLE NOEMA SCENARIO [#230
- WICKED, #232 - KNIFE / WEAPON, #249 - SATOR (#38), #228 - ONTIC LIMIT
/ WITNESSING TRAVESTY AS REPROACH, #237 - DEME LIMIT / USE OF FORCE]
RELATED TO RAMPAGE KILLING EVENTS

(c) 2024 Dolf Leendert Boek, Published: 20 April 2024

In our informal research as self education, the meta-descriptive
aggregation of concepts of mind most likely has some relevance to the
philosophical concept of intentionality. But what we have recognised
from our memeBrain prototypes, is that the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
and its dynamic problem resolution pairing only occurs by being couched
with a preamble for which we have a desire to examine if the resolution
idea has recurrence as then a criteria for its attainment as pairing
action being a function of mind.

For want of a better term, we might consider this dá dào (達到): to reach;
to achieve; to attain

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:達>

dá (達): 1. to attain; to reach, 2. Da, 3. intelligent proficient, 4. to
be open; to be connected, 5. to realize; to complete; to accomplish, 6.
to display; to manifest, 7. to tell; to inform; to say, 8. illustrious;
influential; prestigious, 9. everlasting; constant; unchanging, 10.
generous; magnanimous, 11. commonly; everywhere, 12. arbitrary; freely
come and go

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:到>

dào (到): 1. to arrive, 2. arrive; receive, 3. to go, 4. careful, 5. Dao

APPRAISAL #9: It offends the ear but sets the toe on track. (到耳順止)
The matter will go right. (事貞)
FATHOMING #9: Offended ears, compliant toes (到耳順止)
MEANS: Contrary talk makes for obedient conduct. (逆聞順行也)

dào (到): 1. to arrive, 2. arrive; receive, 3. to go, 4. careful, 5. Dao

ěrshùn (耳順): 1. an obedient *EAR*, 2. pleasing to the ear

zhǐ (止): 1. to stop; to halt, 2. until; to end, 3. Kangxi radical 77, 4.
only, 5. to prohibit; to prevent; to refrain; to suppress, 6. to remain
in one place; to stay, 7. to rest; to settle, 8. deportment; bearing;
demeanor; manner, 9. a particle at the end of a phrase, 10. foot

shì (事): 1. matter; thing; item, 2. to serve, 3. a government post, 4.
duty; post; work, 5. occupation, 6. cause; undertaking; enterprise;
achievement, 7. an accident, 8. to attend, 9. an allusion, 10. a
condition; a state; a situation, 11. to engage in, 12. to enslave, 13.
to pursue, 14. to administer, 15. to appoint, 16. a piece

zhēn (貞): 1. virtuous; chaste; pure, 2. loyal, 3. divination, 4.
chastity, 5. to divine, 6. auspicious, 7. upright, 8. lower part of the
trigrams in the Yijing, 9. four

We want to explore whether achieving this goal as the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY and its dynamic problem resolution pairing, actually
involves the two concepts that have been central to Husserl’s
internalist interpretation of intentionality: the concept of a noema
(plural noemata) and the concept of epoche (i.e., bracketing) or
phenomenological reduction. By the word ‘noema,’ Husserl refers to the
internal structure of mental acts. The phenomenological reduction is
meant to help get at the essence of mental acts by suspending all naive
presuppositions about the difference between real and fictitious
entities (on these complex phenomenological concepts, see the papers by
Føllesdal and others conveniently gathered in Dreyfus (1982). For
further discussion, see Bell (1990) and Dummett (1993).

#169 as [#50, #70, #8, #40, #1] /
#470 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #19 - FOLLOWING (TS'UNG) as [#50,
#70, #8, #40, #1, #300, #1] = nóēma (G3540): {UMBRA: #169 % #41 = #5} 1)
a mental perception, thought; 2) an evil purpose; 3) that which thinks,
the mind, thoughts or purposes

APPRAISAL #3: Men do not attack him. (人不攻之)
They are drawn to follow. (自然證)
FATHOMING #3: That men do not attack him (人不攻之)
MEANS: This, in itself, is proof of Virtue's power. (自然證也)

rén (人): 1. person; people; a human being, 2. Kangxi radical 9, 3. a
kind of person, 4. everybody, 5. adult, 6. somebody; others, 7. an
upright person

bù (不): 1. not; no, 2. expresses that a certain condition cannot be
achieved, 3. as a correlative, 4. no (answering a question), 5. forms a
negative adjective from a noun, 6. at the end of a sentence to form a
question, 7. to form a yes or no question, 8. infix potential marker

gōng (攻): 1. to attack; to assault, 2. to discredit; to impugn; to
criticize, 3. to remedy; to cure, 4. to work at; to handle, 5.
workmanship; expertise, 6. exaction by the state, 7. sturdy; strong, 8.
to govern; to administer, 9. Gong

zhī (之): 1. him; her; them; that, 2. used between a modifier and a word
to form a word group, 3. to go, 4. this; that, 5. genitive marker, 6.
it, 7. in, 8. all, 9. and, 10. however, 11. if, 12. then, 13. to arrive;
to go, 14. is, 15. to use, 16. Zhi

zìrán (自然): 1. nature, 2. natural, 3. of course; certainly; naturally

zhèng (證): 1. proof, 2. to prove; to demonstrate; to confirm; to give
evidence, 3. to advise against, 4. certificate, 5. an illness, 6. to accuse

In fact, commentators have been unable to achieve consensus on exactly
what a noema is. In a recent survey, David Woodruff Smith distinguished
four different schools of thought. On one view, to say that the noema is
the intentional object of an act of consciousness is to mean that it
quite literally is an object. Husserl's student Roman Ingarden, for
example, held that both ordinary objects, like chairs and trees, and
intentional objects, like a chair precisely as it appears to me, or even
a fictional tree, actually exist, but have different "modes" of existence.

An alternative view, developed primarily by Aron Gurwitsch, emphasizes
the noema of perceptual experience. Most ordinary objects can be
perceived in different ways and from different perspectives (consider
looking at a tree from several different positions). For Gurwitsch, what
is perceived in each such act is a noema, and the object itself—the
tree, say—is to be understood as the collection or system of noemata
associated with it. This view has similarities with phenomenalism.

Robert Sokolowski, alternatively, holds that a noema is just the actual
object of perception or judgment itself, considered phenomenologically.
In other words, the noema of the judgment that "this chair is
uncomfortable" is neither an entity (the chair considered as
uncomfortable) which exists in addition to the chair itself (but with a
different mode of existence)—the Ingarden view; nor is the noema of such
a judgment identified with a particular tactile perception of the
chair—which along with other perceptions constitutes the chair as
such—the Gurwitsch view. For Sokolowski, the noema is not a separate
entity at all, but the chair itself as in this instance perceived or
judged. This seems consistent with Husserl's emphasis on the noema as
the "perceived as such…remembered as such...judged as such..."

Analytic philosopher Dagfinn Føllesdal, in an influential 1969 paper,
proposed a Fregean interpretation of the noema, which has been developed
extensively by Ronald McIntyre and David Woodruff Smith. This school of
thought agrees that the noema is not a separate entity, but rather than
identifying it with the actual object of the act (of perceiving,
judging, etc.), phenomenologically understood, this view suggests that
it is a mediating component of the act itself. It is what gives the act
the sense it has. Indeed, Føllesdal and his followers suggest that the
noema is a generalized version of Gottlob Frege's account of linguistic
meaning, and in particular of his concept of sense (Sinn). Just as Frege
held that a linguistic expression picks out its reference by means of
its sense, so Husserl believed that conscious acts generally—not merely
acts of meaning but also acts of perception, judgment, etc.—are
intentionally directed toward objects by means of their noemata. On this
view, the noema is not an object, but an abstract component of certain
types of acts.

Sokolowski has continued to reject this approach, arguing that "(t)o
equate sense and noema would be to equate propositional and
phenomenological reflection. It would take philosophy simply as the
critical reflection on our meanings or senses; it would equate
philosophy with linguistic analysis." Robert C. Solomon attempted to
reconcile the perception-based interpretation of the Gurwitsch school
with the Fregean interpretation of noema as sense, suggesting that while
"(i)t has now become virtually axiomatic among phenomenologists that the
Sinne [senses] of experience stand independent of the Bedeutungen
[meanings] of linguistic expressions. It has become all but axiomatic
among analytic philosophers that there is no meaning apart from
language. It is the concept of the noema that provides the link between
them. The noema embodies both the changing phases of experience and the
organizing sense of our experience. But these two 'components' are not
separable, for all experience requires meaning, not as an after-the-fact
luxury in reflective judgements but in order for it to be experience of
anything." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noema>

On 4/24/2024 1:58 AM, dolf wrote:
> -- (DRAFT 4) INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON A PLAUSIBLE NOEMA SCENARIO

Dolf, did you know that most published research is wrong?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published_Research_Findings_Are_False

> ... > Revision Date: 24 April 2024
O dear... (revisions are usually making it only worse!)

--
Jos

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

There are only two classes of MUSLIMS:

a) Those having NAZI paradigm equivalence which is a comprise of
unsurpassed and seething evil...

b) The ignorant as the godless:

SPOKEN BY THE PROPHET PEACE BE UPON HIM: "Ye worship ye know not what:
we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews." [John 4:22]

<http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Notes%20on%20NOEMA%2020240421.pdf>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

There are only two classes of MUSLIMS:

a) Those having NAZI paradigm equivalence which is a compromise of
unsurpassed and seething evil...

b) The ignorant as the godless:

SPOKEN BY THE PROPHET PEACE BE UPON HIM: "Ye worship ye know not what:
we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews." [John 4:22]

<http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Notes%20on%20NOEMA%2020240421.pdf>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

YOU JOS BERGERVOET ARE EVIDENCE OF WHAT A DEPRAVED, DEGENERATE AND
DISGUSTING PEOPLE THE DUTCH HAVE BECOME AND THE DEAD OF MILLIONS OF
PEOPLES IN YOUR TWO WORLD WARS IS CAUSE ENOUGH THAT YOU OUGHT NEVER HAVE
REDEMPTION FROM GOD

BOER WAR MEMORIAL ANTAGONISM AS IMPLICIT ROMAN CATHOLIC CRIME AGAINST
THE COMMONWEALTH (CAESAROPAPISM) / PENTECOST SUNDAY AS JUPITER (#38 -
SATOR / #33 - TENET / #34 - ROTAS) PRINCIPLE

[#38 - 8 JUNE 1930, #35 - 24 MAY 1931, #33 - 15 MAY 1932, #37 - 4 JUNE
1933, #34 - 20 MAY 1934]

[#38 - 8 JUNE 2014, #35 - 24 MAY 2015 (KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED), #33 -
15 MAY 2016 (IRREGULAR VIETNAM CORPSE INTERMENT IN RAAF WWII CEMETERY),
#37 - 4 JUNE 2017 [TARGETED ATTACKS / SLANDER], #34 - 20 MAY 2018 (WWI
CENTENNIAL HIJACKING)]

[#38 - 8 JUNE 2025, #35 - 24 MAY 2026, #33 - 16 MAY 2027, #37 - 4 JUNE
2028, #34 - 20 MAY 2029]

EASTER SUNDAY occurs between the TETRA / RANGE dates #21 - 22 MARCH
through #28 - ANZAC DAY: 25 APRIL (whereas PENTECOST SUNDAY as 49 days
thereafter occurs within ranges #31 - 10 MAY through #39 - 13 JUNE)
within the Gregorian calendar and may be the 81st through 115th day of
common years or 82nd through 116th day of leap years.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Lawyer%20Notes%2020240409%20%28public%29.pdf>

There are only two classes of MUSLIMS:

a) Those having NAZI paradigm equivalence which is a compromise of
unsurpassed and seething evil...

b) The ignorant as the godless:

SPOKEN BY THE PROPHET PEACE BE UPON HIM: "Ye worship ye know not what:
we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews." [John 4:22]

<http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Notes%20on%20NOEMA%2020240421.pdf>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)