been washing the plastic fantastic today. It was a disgrace! I counted
at least four specs of dust on it!! seriously tho, it did need a clean
having been thru a Melb rainstorm.

I noticed I won't be putting washer water accidentally in the coolant
reservoir like I did with the Lancer. the washers bottle is well away
from other fluid reservoirs. https://auslink.info/pics/ZS_water.jpg

I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as good
as anything else. so far I'm very happy with it.

--
Have a nice day!..

On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:

> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as good
> as anything else.

You have no idea how it relates to anything else, as you've done no
genuine arms length comparative testing.

> so far I'm very happy with it.

And that is the *only* comment you can make that is accurate.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 8/10/2023 1:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
> been washing the plastic fantastic today. It was a disgrace! I counted
> at least four specs of dust on it!! seriously tho, it did need a clean
> having been thru a Melb rainstorm.
>
> I noticed I won't be putting washer water accidentally in the coolant
> reservoir like I did with the Lancer. the washers bottle is well away
> from other fluid reservoirs. https://auslink.info/pics/ZS_water.jpg
>
> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as good
> as anything else. so far I'm very happy with it.
>
>

At the end of the day that is all that matters.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

Noddy wrote:
> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>> good as anything else.
>
> You have no idea how it relates to anything else,

nonsense.

> as you've done no genuine arms length comparative testing.
>
>> so far I'm very happy with it.
>
> And that is the *only* comment you can make that is accurate.
>
>

rubbish

--
Have a nice day!..

On 8/10/2023 4:43 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>
>>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>>> good as anything else.
>>
>> You have no idea how it relates to anything else,
>
> nonsense.

Really?

So what objective "quality" tests have you carried out, and on what
makes and models have you run those tests in order to reach your
conclusions?

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy wrote:
> On 8/10/2023 4:43 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>>>> good as anything else.
>>>
>>> You have no idea how it relates to anything else,
>>
>> nonsense.
>
> Really?
>
> So what objective "quality" tests have you carried out, and on what
> makes and models have you run those tests in order to reach your
> conclusions?
>
>
>
>
>

I'm quite capable of looking at something and forming an opinion about
the quality of it relative to other such items. in no way does the ZS
appear to be inferior to any other similar car in terms of build and
finish. it aint rocket science. I recall that you dissed the MG3 also
and then Xeno had a good look at one and agreed with me there was
nothing bad with the quality of it.

--
Have a nice day!..

On 8/10/2023 5:41 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 8/10/2023 4:43 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>>>>> good as anything else.
>>>>
>>>> You have no idea how it relates to anything else,
>>>
>>> nonsense.
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> So what objective "quality" tests have you carried out, and on what
>> makes and models have you run those tests in order to reach your
>> conclusions?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> I'm quite capable of looking at something and forming an opinion about
> the quality of it relative to other such items.

Are you? :)

> in no way does the ZS appear to be inferior to any other similar car in terms of build and
> finish.

And for some reason I can't help but wonder what other cars did you
compare it to, bearing in mind that you weren't even aware of some of
the other cars in it's class before you made your purchase.

> it aint rocket science. I recall that you dissed the MG3 also
> and then Xeno had a good look at one and agreed with me there was
> nothing bad with the quality of it.

Two things here Felix.

Firstly, I couldn't give a flying fuck what the antiquated teacher
thinks about anything in particular, and would happily bet the farm that
any comment he's ever made about one would be as much of a contrary load
of shite as anything else the mental case has waffled on about.

Secondly, my comments about the MG3, if I remember correctly, were based
on the reviews of it being a pretty shithouse drive, and your own
comments of it not having central locking or not being able to be fitted
with a tow bar.

Which made me wonder why you bought the thing in the first place :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy wrote:
> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as good
>> as anything else.
>
> You have no idea how it relates to anything else, as you've done no
> genuine arms length comparative testing.

lol!
Do tell what you've done Fraudster.

Noddy wrote:
> On 8/10/2023 5:41 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2023 4:43 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>>>>>> good as anything else.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no idea how it relates to anything else,
>>>>
>>>> nonsense.
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> So what objective "quality" tests have you carried out, and on what
>>> makes and models have you run those tests in order to reach your
>>> conclusions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm quite capable of looking at something and forming an opinion about
>> the quality of it relative to other such items.
>
> Are you? :)
>
>
>> in no way does the ZS appear to be inferior to any other similar car
>> in terms of build and finish.
>
> And for some reason I can't help but wonder what other cars did you
> compare it to, bearing in mind that you weren't even aware of some of
> the other cars in it's class before you made your purchase.

Hahaha.
So that'd be *exactly* like you did when you repeatedly brayed that the
Audi equivalent of the Kia Stinger was the A7. Buffoon.

alvey

Noddy wrote:
> On 8/10/2023 5:41 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:

>
> Secondly, my comments about the MG3, if I remember correctly, were based
> on the reviews of it being a pretty shithouse drive,

Given that you've stated, "They may advertise in car specific magazines
but I couldn't tell you as I don't read them" [13Oct22], which "reviews"
would that be Fraudster? Don't tell me that you're getting *all* your
news from Murdoch now...

alvey

On 9/10/2023 8:34 am, alvey wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 8/10/2023 4:16 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>
>>> I can't fault the quality of it as I couldn't with the 3. it's as
>>> good as anything else.
>>
>> You have no idea how it relates to anything else, as you've done no
>> genuine arms length comparative testing.
>
> lol!
> Do tell what you've done Fraudster.
>
I was wondering what *he means* by *arms length* comparative testing.
For sure, given that he collects spotters fees, arms length he isn't.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 9/10/2023 9:06 am, alvey wrote:
> Noddy wrote:
>> On 8/10/2023 5:41 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Secondly, my comments about the MG3, if I remember correctly, were
>> based on the reviews of it being a pretty shithouse drive,
>
> Given that you've stated, "They may advertise in car specific magazines
> but I couldn't tell you as I don't read them" [13Oct22], which "reviews"
> would that be Fraudster? Don't tell me that you're getting *all* your
> news from Murdoch now...
>
> alvey

Given Darren channels John Cadogan so much, you might want to start with
Cadogan's reviews.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)