1960s?
1970s?
1980s?
1990s?
2000s?
2010s?
2020s?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The idiot inquired:

> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

All of the above!

--
solar penguin

In article <uuu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>The idiot inquired:
>
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>All of the above!
>

Get ready for other to pick your feathers!

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

I literally have open right now a Doctor Who Wikipedia page that breaks
down the seasons. LOL Since I already have the episode list open,
let's take a look...

Tom Baker was the Doctor in the 70s, so "State of Decay" coming out in
1980 notwithstanding, the 70s.

However since obviously you didn't really mean to put Classic Who up
against New Who, for the reboot the best decade would be the 2000s.
That would give us Rose and David Tennant and all the awesome goodness
that came in between.

In article <uuuecg$2rr50$1@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>
>I literally have open right now a Doctor Who Wikipedia page that breaks
>down the seasons. LOL Since I already have the episode list open,
>let's take a look...
>
>Tom Baker was the Doctor in the 70s, so "State of Decay" coming out in
>1980 notwithstanding, the 70s.
>
>However since obviously you didn't really mean to put Classic Who up
>against New Who, for the reboot the best decade would be the 2000s.
>That would give us Rose and David Tennant and all the awesome goodness
>that came in between.

So for you 1970s, early 1980s and 2000s!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?

1970s

We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke crap that
brought the series to its end in 2017.

> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <uuv13u$30dm2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>
>1970s
>
>We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke crap that
>brought the series to its end in 2017.
>
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>

So far mostly the 1970s

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
Paul McGann in 1996.

The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.

In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>1970s?
>1980s?

I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>Paul McGann in 1996.
>
>The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>

I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <Ubu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>1970s?
>>1980s?
>
>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>

The JN-T years.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> 1960s?
>>> 1970s?
>>> 1980s?
>>> 1990s?
>>> 2000s?
>>> 2010s?
>>> 2020s?
>>
>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>
>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>
>
> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.

+1

In article <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>> 1980s?
>>>> 1990s?
>>>> 2000s?
>>>> 2010s?
>>>> 2020s?
>>>
>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>
>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>
>>
>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>
>+1

+2
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 9/4/24 3:33 pm:
> In article <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name
>>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> 1960s? 1970s? 1980s? 1990s? 2000s? 2010s? 2020s?
>>>>
>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised
>>>> movie with Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>
>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show
>>>> started in 2005.
>>>
>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>
>> +1
>
> +2
>
WHAT??? YOU, asswipe, think you are sooooo important that YOU, asswipe,
should get TWO votes!! REALLY??
--
Daniel

In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
<arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>> 1980s?
>>>> 1990s?
>>>> 2000s?
>>>> 2010s?
>>>> 2020s?
>>>
>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>
>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>
>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>
>+1

I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
hideous.
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

John Hall wrote:

> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
> > On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
> >
> > +1
>
> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take
> on the Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly
> charming rather than hideous.

It looked like the writer/producer of the TVM hadn't researched
the subtleties of the character and just knew 'The Master' was
"the bad guy"... so we just got the stereotypical US TV show bad
guy... which was a million miles away from Roger Delgado's
original version of that character.

I have yet to hear any of the Eric Roberts 'Master' Big Finish
audios to see if better scripts have improved his take on the
character. Not that they could be any worse than his performance
in the TVM!

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> John Hall wrote:
>
>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take
>> on the Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly
>> charming rather than hideous.
>
> It looked like the writer/producer of the TVM hadn't researched
> the subtleties of the character and just knew 'The Master' was
> "the bad guy"... so we just got the stereotypical US TV show bad
> guy... which was a million miles away from Roger Delgado's
> original version of that character.
>
> I have yet to hear any of the Eric Roberts 'Master' Big Finish
> audios to see if better scripts have improved his take on the
> character. Not that they could be any worse than his performance
> in the TVM!
>

Yes. He oozes a sleazy menace that gives his Master a very distinct tone
and redeems him a lot. However the constraint that this incarnation can
exist only as a lost soul in the Vortex, due to his TVM arc, limits the
stories somewhat. The War Master was a full reboot of the individual in
canon so the Roberts Master ultimately cannot survive.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

In article <uv31lq$4shr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 9/4/24 3:33 pm:
>> In article <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>, Your Name
>>>> <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> 1960s? 1970s? 1980s? 1990s? 2000s? 2010s? 2020s?
>>>>>
>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised
>>>>> movie with Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>
>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show
>>>>> started in 2005.
>>>>
>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +2
>>
>WHAT??? YOU, a%e, think you are sooooo important that YOU, a%e,
>should get TWO votes!! REALLY??

How dense are you red-beard?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
><arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>
>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>
>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>
>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>
>>+1
>
>I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>hideous.

What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?

>--
>John Hall
> "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
> from coughing."
> Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okd6n4ixn0ii002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>John Hall wrote:
>
>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>> > On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>> >
>> > +1
>>
>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take
>> on the Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly
>> charming rather than hideous.
>
>It looked like the writer/producer of the TVM hadn't researched
>the subtleties of the character and just knew 'The Master' was
>"the bad guy"... so we just got the stereotypical US TV show bad
>guy... which was a million miles away from Roger Delgado's
>original version of that character.
>
>I have yet to hear any of the Eric Roberts 'Master' Big Finish
>audios to see if better scripts have improved his take on the
>character. Not that they could be any worse than his performance
>in the TVM!

BF does rock.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uv361d$5tri$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> John Hall wrote:
>>
>>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take
>>> on the Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly
>>> charming rather than hideous.
>>
>> It looked like the writer/producer of the TVM hadn't researched
>> the subtleties of the character and just knew 'The Master' was
>> "the bad guy"... so we just got the stereotypical US TV show bad
>> guy... which was a million miles away from Roger Delgado's
>> original version of that character.
>>
>> I have yet to hear any of the Eric Roberts 'Master' Big Finish
>> audios to see if better scripts have improved his take on the
>> character. Not that they could be any worse than his performance
>> in the TVM!
>>
>
>Yes. He oozes a sleazy menace that gives his Master a very distinct tone
>and redeems him a lot. However the constraint that this incarnation can
>exist only as a lost soul in the Vortex, due to his TVM arc, limits the
>stories somewhat. The War Master was a full reboot of the individual in
>canon so the Roberts Master ultimately cannot survive.
>

War MAster? Hmm ...

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
> John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>>
>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>
>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>>
>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>> Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>> hideous.
>
> What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>
>> --
>

I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They
exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a
*little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him
git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A
throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the
plan all along but the scene was cut for time.

In article <uv58i7$p3a5$3@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
>> John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>>> Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>>> hideous.
>>
>> What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>>
>>> --
>>
>
>I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They
>exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a
>*little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him
>git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A
>throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the
>plan all along but the scene was cut for time.

Exactly! A trial for the Master by the Daleks?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>>>1970s?
>>>1980s?
>>
>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>
>The JN-T years.

I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>>>1970s?
>>>>1980s?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>
>>The JN-T years.
>
>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>

Early 1980s then.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown